IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Pritchard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-09 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 — NTDP-U18 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 49 14 22 36 0.735 0.4516 0.4505 2.1646 2.1592
2014-15 Powell River Kings BCHL 54 39 37 76 1.407 0.5243 0.5115 2.0507 2.0005
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UMass D1 HockeyEast SR 41 16 31 47 1.146
2017-18 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 29 9 11 20 0.690
2016-17 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 33 9 13 22 0.667
2015-16 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 34 9 12 21 0.618
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2015-16 · St. Lawrence
+48.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.