← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Whitaker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 EHLP 27 1 0 1 0.037 0.0042 0.0039 0.0083 0.0077
2018-19 New York Apple Core EHL 24 0 1 1 0.042 0.0096 0.0090 0.0204 0.0192
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Chester University ACHA_D1 35 16 30 46 1.314
2024-25 West Chester University ACHA_D1 35 16 30 46 1.314
2023-24 West Chester University ACHA_D1 35 16 30 46 1.314
2022-23 West Chester University ACHA_D1 35 16 30 46 1.314
2021-22 West Chester University ACHA_D1 35 16 30 46 1.314
2020-21 West Chester University ACHA_D1 35 16 30 46 1.314
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.01
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.31
2020-21 · West Chester University
+21805.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#65092
Forward overall
#3705
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2014-15
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2023-24
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.