IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Clare Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — NAHL 31 1 0 1 0.032 0.0119 0.0116 0.0341 0.0334
2014-15 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 42 2 2 4 0.095 0.0350 0.0324 0.1005 0.0931
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 21 1 3 4 0.191
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 30 1 6 7 0.233
2016-17 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 26 2 4 6 0.231
2015-16 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 28 1 5 6 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2015-16 · Salve Regina
+844.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30095
Defenseman overall
#2674
Defenseman born in 1994
#6960
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Martin Sundstedt
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Nelson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilson McCloy
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.