← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wilson McCloy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New York Apple Core EHL 19 1 3 4 0.210 0.0486 0.0485 0.1030 0.1028
2017-18 New York Apple Core EHL 41 5 18 23 0.561 0.1296 0.1221 0.2745 0.2587
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wesleyan D1 NESCAC SO 7 0 1 1 0.143
2019-20 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 7 0 1 1 0.143
2018-19 Wesleyan D1 NESCAC FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2018-19 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2018-19 · Wesleyan
+90.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11289
Defenseman overall
#1815
Defenseman born in 1997
#1428
in EHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Williams · 2017-18
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.