← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Altmann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Duluth East High USHS-MN 24 8 12 20 0.833 0.2243 0.2133 0.2024 0.1925
2015-16 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 44 3 12 15 0.341 0.1266 0.1307 0.9988 0.9973
2016-17 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 40 8 6 14 0.350 0.1300 0.1272
2017-18 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 58 12 15 27 0.466 0.1728 0.1605 0.4929 0.4579
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Williams D3 NESCAC 21 2 4 6 0.286
2019-20 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 25 11 5 16 0.640
2018-19 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 25 10 4 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2018-19 · Williams
+344.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27914
Forward overall
#1226
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2018-19
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.