← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Croteau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 South Shore Kings NCDC 9 3 1 4 0.444 0.1252 0.1347 0.3598 0.3871
2019-20 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 21 8 7 15 0.714 0.0961 0.0961 0.2431 0.2431
2020-21 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 39 18 18 36 0.923 0.1242 0.1242 0.3142 0.3142
2021-22 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 43 20 29 49 1.139 0.1534 0.1415 0.3879 0.3579
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 12 5 9 14 1.167
2024-25 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 19 3 3 6 0.316
2023-24 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 20 6 6 12 0.600
2022-23 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 20 4 4 8 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2022-23 · Lebanon Valley
+236.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31236
Forward overall
#1255
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2006-07
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.