← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Croteau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 South Shore Kings NCDC 9 3 1 4 0.444 0.1812 0.1950 0.3556 0.3826
2019-20 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 21 8 7 15 0.714 0.0937 0.0937 0.2425 0.2425
2020-21 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 39 18 18 36 0.923 0.1211 0.1211 0.3134 0.3134
2021-22 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 43 20 29 49 1.139 0.1495 0.1379 0.3869 0.3570
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 12 5 9 14 1.167
2024-25 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 19 3 3 6 0.316
2023-24 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 20 6 6 12 0.600
2022-23 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 20 4 4 8 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2022-23 · Lebanon Valley
+190.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14533
Forward overall
#692
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alvernia · 2022-23
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2006-07
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.