← New Search ↗ Social Card

Auggie Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Benilde-St. Margaret's School USHS-MN 25 2 6 8 0.320 0.0861 0.0862 0.0777 0.0778
2016-17 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 30 7 7 14 0.467 0.1733 0.1783 0.4941 0.5084
2017-18 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 58 13 13 26 0.448 0.1665 0.1631 0.4747 0.4650
2018-19 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 59 9 16 25 0.424 0.1573 0.1470 0.4486 0.4193
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 26 8 16 24 0.923
2021-22 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 27 15 13 28 1.037
2020-21 Saint John's D3 SO 10 5 8 13 1.300
2019-20 Saint John's D3 FR 25 11 16 27 1.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2019-20 · Saint John's
+722.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25353
Forward overall
#1044
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2010-11
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.