← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Dvorak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 MJHL 13 0 2 2 0.154 0.0435 0.0445 0.0969 0.0991
2007-08 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 56 8 12 20 0.357 0.1032 0.1008 0.2688 0.2625
2008-09 Manitoulin Islanders NOJHL 27 6 15 21 0.778 0.1311 0.1200 0.3232 0.2959
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Saint Mary's D3 SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#27818
Forward overall
#1121
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.