IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Deal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 32 5 0 5 0.156 0.0574 0.0590 0.1649 0.1696
2012-13 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 58 3 15 18 0.310 0.1140 0.1115 0.3275 0.3204
2013-14 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 54 8 12 20 0.370 0.1361 0.1263 0.3910 0.3629
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 25 10 10 20 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2014-15 · Gustavus Adolphus
+676.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42316
Forward overall
#1549
Forward born in 1993
#4588
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jerry Laakso
UMass Dartmouth · 2013-14
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zachary Vierling
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Rielly
SUNY Brockport · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.