IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Trujillo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Milton Menace OJHL 42 4 9 13 0.309 0.0865 0.0869 0.2136 0.2145
2014-15 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 48 7 10 17 0.354 0.0990 0.0943 0.2444 0.2328
2015-16 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 53 20 18 38 0.717 0.2003 0.1798 0.4948 0.4440
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE SR 25 2 6 8 0.320
2018-19 Curry D3 CNE JR 26 4 9 13 0.500
2017-18 Curry D3 CNE SO 25 1 4 5 0.200
2016-17 Curry D3 CNE FR 12 2 3 5 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2016-17 · Curry
+234.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29066
Forward overall
#1198
Forward born in 1995
#2580
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pearce Vance
Westfield State · 2015-16
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Drapluk
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Minerva
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.