← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Trujillo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Milton Menace OJHL 42 4 9 13 0.309 0.0759 0.0762 0.2131 0.2140
2014-15 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 48 7 10 17 0.354 0.0868 0.0827 0.2439 0.2323
2015-16 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 53 20 18 38 0.717 0.1757 0.1577 0.4937 0.4430
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Curry D1 CNE SR 25 2 6 8 0.320
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE SR 25 2 6 8 0.320
2018-19 Curry D1 CNE JR 26 4 9 13 0.500
2018-19 Curry D3 CNE JR 26 4 9 13 0.500
2017-18 Curry D3 CNE SO 25 1 4 5 0.200
2016-17 Curry D3 CNE FR 12 2 3 5 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2016-17 · Curry
+281.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36351
Forward overall
#1488
Forward born in 1995
#2173
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2015-16
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.