IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louis-Mathieu Ruel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Express Hockey Club EHL 28 2 2 4 0.143 0.0209 0.0206 0.0701 0.0692
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 24 3 1 4 0.167
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 24 3 1 4 0.167
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 24 3 1 4 0.167
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 24 3 1 4 0.167
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 24 3 1 4 0.167
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 24 3 1 4 0.167

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#57335
Forward overall
#3809
Forward born in 2002
#2957
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Kovalchik
Castleton · 2012-13
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kirk Golden
Hobart · 2004-05
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Langfield
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2012-13
0.059 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.