IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Langfield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-12-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Mason City Toros NA3HL 43 2 10 12 0.279 0.0309 0.0307 0.0884 0.0878
2012-13 Mason City Toros NA3HL 41 13 35 48 1.171 0.1295 0.1221 0.2625 0.2534
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — JR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2014-15 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SO 20 1 5 6 0.300
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — FR 17 0 1 1 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2013-14 · Saint Mary's (MN)
-27.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7606
Defenseman overall
#1138
Defenseman born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Sorensen
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Prost
Western New England · 2009-10
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Collins
Becker · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.