IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Prost Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-12-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Ohio Blue Jackets USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 51 5 12 17 0.333 0.1225 0.1232 0.3518 0.3539
2009-10 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 48 4 10 14 0.292 0.1072 0.1035 0.3079 0.2974
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Western New England D3 CNE SR 24 12 11 23 0.958
2012-13 Western New England D3 CNE JR 25 8 17 25 1.000
2011-12 Western New England D3 CNE SO 23 3 13 16 0.696
2010-11 Western New England D3 CNE FR 25 10 12 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2010-11 · Western New England
+823.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41822
Forward overall
#1386
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Malcolm Cardwell
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Lenius
Fredonia · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmie Perkins
Bethel · 2010-11
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.