← New Search ↗ Social Card

Camden Glonek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Canterbury NE-Prep 27 1 2 3 0.111 0.0220 0.0220 0.0506 0.0506
2021-22 Canterbury NE-Prep 24 1 4 5 0.208 0.0413 0.0413 0.0949 0.0949
2022-23 Seahawks Hockey EHL 40 1 1 2 0.050 0.0116 0.0123 0.0245 0.0261
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 0 2 2 0.091
2024-25 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 0 2 2 0.091
2023-24 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 0 2 2 0.091
2022-23 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 0 2 2 0.091
2021-22 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 0 2 2 0.091
2020-21 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 0 2 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2020-21 · University of North Carolina
+337.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
78%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29022
Defenseman overall
#4409
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roger Williams · 2023-24
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2002-03
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.