IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ashton Gallagher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-13 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Calgary Canucks AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 39 4 6 10 0.256 0.0697 0.0717 0.1616 0.1663
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roger Williams D3 CNE FR 10 0 1 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2025-26 · Roger Williams
+62.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#53230
Forward overall
#3700
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Nikac
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jayson Saraceno
New England College · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Heidepriem
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.