← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Laus Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-02-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Soo Greyhounds OHL 68 12 17 29 0.426 0.2467 0.2682 1.0959 1.1915
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21757
Forward overall
#79
Forward born in 2009
#853
in OHL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Maine (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2021-22
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.