IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathew McEnroe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — EHL 38 2 2 4 0.105 0.0154 0.0158 0.0516 0.0530
2024-25 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 39 4 6 10 0.256 0.0375 0.0366 0.1256 0.1225
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 23 1 3 4 0.174
2024-25 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 23 1 3 4 0.174
2023-24 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 23 1 3 4 0.174
2022-23 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 23 1 3 4 0.174
2021-22 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 23 1 3 4 0.174
2020-21 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 23 1 3 4 0.174

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#53778
Forward overall
#3749
Forward born in 2004
#2650
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Rozsival
Wisconsin-Superior · 2022-23
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Graham Denomme
Elmira · 2018-19
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Woll
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2004-05
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.