← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Rozsival Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Chippewa Steel NAHL 25 4 3 7 0.280 0.1040 0.1040 0.2965 0.2965
2021-22 Calgary Canucks AJHL 25 3 10 13 0.520 0.1737 0.1712 0.4827 0.4758
2022-23 Calgary Canucks AJHL 46 9 19 28 0.609 0.2033 0.1903 0.5651 0.5290
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 26 8 13 21 0.808
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 17 3 2 5 0.294
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 20 4 0 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Superior
+27.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
45%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27082
Forward overall
#1147
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2004-05
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2018-19
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.719 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.