← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Rozsival Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-16 Country: USA
2025 · Round 6, Pick #161  ·  New Jersey Devils New Jersey Devils
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Chippewa Steel NAHL 25 4 3 7 0.280 0.1029 0.1029 0.2955 0.2955
2021-22 Calgary Canucks AJHL 25 3 10 13 0.520 0.1744 0.1719 0.4812 0.4743
2022-23 Calgary Canucks AJHL 46 9 19 28 0.609 0.2042 0.1912 0.5633 0.5273
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 26 8 13 21 0.808
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 17 3 2 5 0.294
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 20 4 0 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Superior
+27.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36106
Forward overall
#2201
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2004-05
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2022-23
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.719 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.