IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Behrje Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Jersey 87's EHLP 39 14 21 35 0.897 0.1029 0.1060 0.2023 0.2084
2023-24 New Jersey 87's EHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0385 0.0400 0.0816 0.0848
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 27 10 5 15 0.556
2024-25 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 27 10 5 15 0.556
2023-24 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 27 10 5 15 0.556
2022-23 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 27 10 5 15 0.556
2021-22 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 27 10 5 15 0.556
2020-21 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 27 10 5 15 0.556

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39107
Forward overall
#2495
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Tabor
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Woodward
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2004-05
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Boudreau
Wilkes · 2022-23
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.