IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon-Olivier Ruel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Express Hockey Club EHL 25 0 1 1 0.040 0.0059 0.0061 0.0196 0.0202
2024-25 Express Hockey Club EHL 46 7 8 15 0.326 0.0477 0.0467 0.1599 0.1566
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#52365
Forward overall
#3634
Forward born in 2004
#2560
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Mros
Bethel · 2015-16
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Poliziani
Trinity · 2017-18
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aiden Moser
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.