IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Mros Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 45 7 18 25 0.556 0.0614 0.0581 0.1760 0.1664
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bethel D1 — SR 25 0 3 3 0.120
2019-20 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 25 0 3 3 0.120
2018-19 Bethel D1 — JR 25 1 1 2 0.080
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 25 1 1 2 0.080
2017-18 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 25 2 6 8 0.320
2016-17 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 25 1 6 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2016-17 · Bethel
+386.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16760
Defenseman overall
#1997
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Rial
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Strickland
Colby · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Carson
Amherst · 2006-07
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.