← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Roe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 8 4 1 5 0.625 0.0915 0.0915 0.3061 0.3061
2020-21 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 36 3 3 6 0.167 0.0244 0.0244 0.0816 0.0816
2021-22 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 45 17 7 24 0.533 0.0781 0.0768 0.2612 0.2569
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 27 2 4 6 0.222
2024-25 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 23 3 2 5 0.217
2023-24 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 20 1 3 4 0.200
2022-23 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 26 3 5 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · Westfield State
+368.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36992
Forward overall
#2015
Forward born in 2001
#1394
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2013-14
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.