← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Strickland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-09-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Lloydminster Blazers AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2003-04 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 53 3 8 11 0.207 0.0696 0.0721 0.1923 0.1992
2004-05 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 59 4 14 18 0.305 0.1023 0.1011 0.2828 0.2794
2005-06 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 58 5 15 20 0.345 0.1156 0.1087 0.3196 0.3006
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Colby D3 SR 24 1 7 8 0.333
2008-09 Colby D3 JR 24 2 8 10 0.417
2007-08 Colby D3 SO 25 1 3 4 0.160
2006-07 Colby D3 FR 25 4 8 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2006-07 · Colby
+381.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16996
Defenseman overall
#1439
Defenseman born in 1985
#1915
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2011-12
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.