← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Allwein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 14 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 25 0 3 3 0.120 0.0277 0.0262 0.0587 0.0556
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059
2024-25 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059
2023-24 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059
2022-23 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059
2021-22 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059
2020-21 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 17 1 0 1 0.059

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30589
Defenseman overall
#4565
Defenseman born in 2004
#3302
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2017-18
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.053 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.