IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Kettwig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Kimball Union NE-Prep 33 1 3 4 0.121 0.0240 0.0240 0.0552 0.0552
2023-24 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier 40 17 13 30 0.750 0.0981 0.0954 0.2545 0.2474
2024-25 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 41 8 15 23 0.561 0.1296 0.1228 0.2745 0.2601
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roger Williams D3 CNE FR 20 2 0 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2025-26 · Roger Williams
4.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32340
Forward overall
#1948
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Barber
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Pavek
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Sonedecker
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.