IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Pavek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-01-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — NAHL 47 13 6 19 0.404 0.1501 0.1534 0.4281 0.4376
2011-12 — NAHL 58 6 23 29 0.500 0.1857 0.1807 0.5294 0.5151
2012-13 Jamestown Ironmen NAHL 59 12 16 28 0.475 0.1762 0.1626 0.5025 0.4637
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 28 3 4 7 0.250
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 26 9 8 17 0.654
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 27 10 5 15 0.556
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 20 5 6 11 0.550
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2013-14 · St. Norbert
+278.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23891
Forward overall
#1038
Forward born in 1992
#2529
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Laflamme
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Turville
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Roll
Amherst · 2012-13
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.