IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Roll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Brockville Braves CCHL 60 8 32 40 0.667 0.1446 0.1447 0.5107 0.5109
2011-12 Brockville Braves CCHL 42 15 21 36 0.857 0.1859 0.1764 0.6565 0.6231
2012-13 Brockville Braves CCHL 52 17 48 65 1.250 0.2711 0.2453 0.9575 0.8664
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 21 4 7 11 0.524
2015-16 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 26 3 6 9 0.346
2014-15 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 20 2 2 4 0.200
2013-14 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 27 4 6 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2013-14 · Amherst
+98.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14882
Forward overall
#561
Forward born in 1992
#181
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike McPherson
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Parsons
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
R.J. Kleiman
Curry · 2010-11
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.