IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Roll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Brockville Braves CCHL 60 8 32 40 0.667 0.1903 0.1904 0.5161 0.5163
2011-12 Brockville Braves CCHL 42 15 21 36 0.857 0.2446 0.2321 0.6635 0.6297
2012-13 Brockville Braves CCHL 52 17 48 65 1.250 0.3568 0.3229 0.9676 0.8756
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 21 4 7 11 0.524
2015-16 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 26 3 6 9 0.346
2014-15 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 20 2 2 4 0.200
2013-14 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 27 4 6 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2013-14 · Amherst
+51.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11725
Forward overall
#517
Forward born in 1992
#221
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Woodliffe
Northland · 2017-18
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Oldcorn
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Remenda
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.