| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Alaska Avalanche | NAHL | 38 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0.210 | 0.0782 | 0.0840 | 0.2229 | 0.2395 |
| 2010-11 | — | NAHL | 59 | 34 | 22 | 56 | 0.949 | 0.3524 | 0.3606 | 1.0050 | 1.0285 |
| 2011-12 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 11 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.364 | 0.2315 | 0.2172 | 1.0896 | 1.0224 |
| 2012-13 | Wenatchee Wild | NAHL | 59 | 20 | 26 | 46 | 0.780 | 0.2895 | 0.2675 | 0.8255 | 0.7626 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | SR | 28 | 17 | 22 | 39 | 1.393 |
| 2015-16 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | JR | 31 | 10 | 18 | 28 | 0.903 |
| 2014-15 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | SO | 28 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.464 |
| 2013-14 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | FR | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.333 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.