IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Barber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 38 5 3 8 0.210 0.0773 0.0830 0.2222 0.2387
2010-11 — NAHL 59 34 22 56 0.949 0.3487 0.3569 1.0019 1.0253
2011-12 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 11 1 3 4 0.364 0.2145 0.2013 1.0920 1.0247
2012-13 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 59 20 26 46 0.780 0.2865 0.2647 0.8230 0.7603
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 28 17 22 39 1.393
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 31 10 18 28 0.903
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 28 5 8 13 0.464
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+62.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17890
Forward overall
#685
Forward born in 1992
#1038
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Lemirande
Lawrence · 2011-12
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Keyes
Aurora · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Cole
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.