IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Bertolino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-11 Country: USA
Manhattanville
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 New Jersey 87's EHL 35 6 11 17 0.486 0.1122 0.1130 0.2377 0.2394
2025-26 New Jersey 87's EHL 49 16 39 55 1.122 0.2593 0.2464 0.5492 0.5219
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
50%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16077
Forward overall
#836
Forward born in 2005
#266
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Manhattanville Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Noah Bradley
0.56
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Evan Michalchuk
0.53
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Jeffrey Beck
0.48
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Cory Anderson
0.74
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Wishart
Middlebury · 2024-25
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Bruce
Williams · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Bradley
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.