← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon Belohorsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-10-18 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Bili Tygri Liberec U20 USHL-Style-Czech 10 3 4 7 0.700 0.2162 0.2432 0.7476 0.8409
2025-26 Guelph Storm OHL 34 9 4 13 0.382 0.2212 0.2370 0.9826 1.0528
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25185
Forward overall
#373
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Niagara
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2015-16
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2016-17
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.