IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Biagio Lerario Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Chicago Steel USHL 30 4 4 8 0.267 0.1698 0.1812 0.7992 0.8527
2013-14 — USHL 37 5 3 8 0.216 0.1377 0.1405 0.6479 0.6610
2014-15 Lincoln Stars USHL 58 20 14 34 0.586 0.3733 0.3625 1.7567 1.7059
2015-16 Lincoln Stars USHL 51 16 24 40 0.784 0.4994 0.4617 2.3503 2.1730
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 32 4 3 7 0.219
2018-19 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 34 4 4 8 0.235
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 28 3 7 10 0.357
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 28 1 3 4 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2016-17 · Northeastern
-60.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6264
Forward overall
#221
Forward born in 1995
#999
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Whitelaw
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Hepler
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Gravelle
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.