IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Leo Laschon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-03-19 Country: USA
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Oshawa Generals OHL 50 2 11 13 0.260 0.1504 0.1568 0.6808 0.7096
2026-27 Oshawa Generals OHL 7 1 2 3 0.429 0.2479 0.2479 1.1222 1.1222
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10868
Defenseman overall
#707
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Marcus Kearsey
QMJHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
Jérémie Bucheler
BCHL 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
Jordan Tourigny
QMJHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
Jack Henry
BCHL 2022-23
0.03
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Hale
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Duhamel
Norwich · 2003-04
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Cook
Babson · 2001-02
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.