IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rowen Sang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-03 Country: Canada
Dartmouth
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Kimball Union NE-Prep 37 14 17 31 0.838 0.1660 0.1660 0.3817 0.3817
2025-26 Oshawa Generals OHL 59 5 2 7 0.119 0.0686 0.0714 0.3047 0.3169
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38836
Forward overall
#681
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Félix Caron
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jason Cotton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Adam Winborg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kiefer Sherwood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Miami (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Riley Alferd
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Dartmouth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brock Cummings
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Cooper Flinton
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.56
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Nikita Nikora
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.80
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Nathan Morin
BCHL 2021-22
0.52
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth

D2/3 Comparables

Roman Pfennings
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bob Marx
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2007-08
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2013-14
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.