IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

George Komadoski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-08-03 Country: USA
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 50 0 3 3 0.060 0.0347 0.0368 0.1542 0.1636
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28928
Defenseman overall
#1472
Defenseman born in 2008
#1786
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Nash Worden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anthony Walsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jake Boltmann
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Henry Nelson
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.03
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Ryan Helliwell
BCHL 2019-20
0.03
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Nathan Billitier
NTDP-U18 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

Bailey Kirwin
Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Wynia
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Hallford
Trine · 2014-15
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.