IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew O’Sullivan

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Dartmouth
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Kimball Union NE-Prep 33 4 21 25 0.758 0.1501 0.1501 0.3452 0.3452
2023-24 Kimball Union NE-Prep 34 8 46 54 1.588 0.3146 0.3146 0.7236 0.7236
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2303
Defenseman overall
#47
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Will Butcher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clark Kuster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.29 No data
NCAAe PPG

Dartmouth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Connor Yau
USHL 2013-14
0.39
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Tim Shoup
USHL 2013-14
0.20
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Tanner Palocsik
NCDC 2017-18
0.77
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Brock Devlin
NAHL 2023-24
0.30
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Zalba
Neumann · 2006-07
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Schremp
Elmira · 2001-02
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Caleb Anderson
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.