IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Shoup Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-06-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 52 5 11 16 0.308 0.1815 0.1831 0.9241 0.9320
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SR 26 5 5 10 0.385
2016-17 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 22 0 1 1 0.045
2015-16 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 34 2 7 9 0.265
2014-15 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 25 0 5 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2014-15 · Dartmouth
+15.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7533
Defenseman overall
#1189
Defenseman born in 1995
#2813
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Wheeler
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave McKenna
Elmira · 2004-05
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Wandmacher
Saint John's · 2019-20
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.