← New Search ↗ Social Card

Billy MacAusland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Brown
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 27 8 1 9 0.333 0.0660 0.0660 0.1519 0.1519
2023-24 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 26 12 15 27 1.038 0.2057 0.2057 0.4731 0.4731
2024-25 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 27 28 32 60 2.222 0.4402 0.4402 1.0124 1.0124
2025-26 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 26 21 22 43 1.654 0.3276 0.3276 0.7535 0.7535
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6129
Forward overall
#8
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

Brown Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.20
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.33
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2023-24
0.09
actual FR PPG at Brown
USHL 2016-17
0.36
actual FR PPG at Brown

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2007-08
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2000-01
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.