IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Barrett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
Yale
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Andover NE-Prep 31 10 13 23 0.742 0.1492 0.1492 0.3393 0.3393
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26912
Forward overall
#272
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Yale Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

David Chen
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.47
actual FR PPG at Yale
Julian Frias
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.20
actual FR PPG at Yale
Beanie Richter
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Yale
Kurt Gurkan
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.25
actual FR PPG at Yale

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Muise
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Wendorf
Hamline · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Brandt
Tufts · 2016-17
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.