IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robby Dee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-04-09 Country: USA
2005 · Round 3, Pick #86  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Omaha Lancers USHL 32 6 6 12 0.375 0.2212 0.2225 1.1263 1.1331
2006-07 Omaha Lancers USHL 34 11 14 25 0.735 0.4338 0.4141 2.2084 2.1082
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 36 13 22 35 0.972
2009-10 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 33 13 12 25 0.758
2008-09 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 33 6 5 11 0.333
2007-08 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 24 1 2 3 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2007-08 · Maine
-56.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11438
Forward overall
#392
Forward born in 1987
#1034
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Miraldo
Westfield State · 2021-22
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.