← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-05-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 53 5 14 19 0.358 0.1381 0.1550
2004-05 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0973 0.1018 0.4901 0.5130
2005-06 Swift Current Broncos WHL 34 3 10 13 0.382 0.1860 0.1860 0.9370 0.9369
2006-07 Swift Current Broncos WHL 71 10 27 37 0.521 0.2535 0.2405 1.2769 1.2116
2007-08 Swift Current Broncos WHL 64 6 41 47 0.734 0.3573 0.3207 1.7995 1.6152
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 14 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 14 0 2 2 0.143
2012-13 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#3410
Defenseman overall
#574
Defenseman born in 1987

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2012-13
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.