IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Principalli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-01-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Saskatoon Blades WHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 55 5 8 13 0.236 0.0920 0.0922 0.3447 0.3456
2008-09 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 57 3 10 13 0.228 0.0888 0.0853 0.3326 0.3195
2009-10 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 58 4 28 32 0.552 0.1843 0.1681 0.5121 0.4671
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 15 1 3 4 0.267
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#8547
Defenseman overall
#1189
Defenseman born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Schindel
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Allen
Marian · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabriel Laflamme
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.