← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abigail Chamernick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 24 0 3 3 0.125 0.0189 0.0189
2018-19 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 25 1 8 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544
2019-20 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 20 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 2 6 8 0.364 0.0549 0.0549
2021-22 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 10 31 41 1.367 0.2064 0.2064
2022-23 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 4 24 28 1.167 0.1762 0.1566
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 28 11 22 33 1.179
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC 25 10 11 21 0.840
2023-24 Hamline D3 MIAC 26 6 7 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · Hamline
+200.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1300
Defenseman overall
#222
Defenseman born in 2004
#921
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2015-16
0.935 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.