IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Cozine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Rochester Mustangs USHL 52 7 11 18 0.346 0.2042 0.2054 1.0398 1.0458
2001-02 Rochester Mustangs USHL 59 6 9 15 0.254 0.1500 0.1434 0.7635 0.7299
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 25 4 4 8 0.320
2003-04 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 27 4 5 9 0.333
2002-03 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 24 4 14 18 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2002-03 · St. Thomas
+420.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31660
Forward overall
#714
Forward born in 1981
#2945
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Corran
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2001-02
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jory Mullin
Neumann · 2012-13
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Bombardier
Trine · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.