IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Cozine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Rochester Mustangs USHL 52 7 11 18 0.346 0.2128 0.2140 1.0200 1.0258
2001-02 Rochester Mustangs USHL 59 6 9 15 0.254 0.1563 0.1494 0.7489 0.7159
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 St. Thomas D3 — JR 25 4 4 8 0.320
2003-04 St. Thomas D3 — SO 27 4 5 9 0.333
2002-03 St. Thomas D3 — FR 24 4 14 18 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2002-03 · St. Thomas
+400.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31433
Forward overall
#706
Forward born in 1981
#2967
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jory Mullin
Neumann · 2012-13
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Corran
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2001-02
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Frost
Castleton · 2010-11
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.