← New Search ↗ Social Card

Celia Midtbo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-11-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Minneapolis High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 8 0 8 0.333 0.0503 0.0503
2019-20 Minneapolis High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 10 15 25 1.000 0.1510 0.1510
2020-21 Minneapolis High (W) USHS-MN-W 18 15 10 25 1.389 0.2097 0.2097
2021-22 Minneapolis High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 45 9 54 2.077 0.3136 0.3136
2022-23 Minneapolis High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 33 12 45 1.731 0.2614 0.2326
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC JR 25 5 8 13 0.520
2024-25 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SO 23 7 8 15 0.652
2024-25 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 23 7 8 15 0.652
2023-24 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC FR 21 6 8 14 0.667
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 25 11 10 21 0.840
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2023-24 · Saint Mary's
+166.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#402
Defenseman overall
#94
Defenseman born in 2004
#215
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Union ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.