← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ava Anick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 1 7 8 0.348 0.0525 0.0525
2020-21 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 0 9 9 0.429 0.0647 0.0647
2021-22 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 2 11 13 0.500 0.0755 0.0755
2022-23 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 29 3 12 15 0.517 0.0781 0.0706
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 29 2 9 11 0.379
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 29 2 15 17 0.586
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 14 0 2 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2023-24 · St. Norbert
+108.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3635
Defenseman overall
#397
Defenseman born in 2005
#2950
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2014-15
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2022-23
0.194 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.