← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kurtia Yetman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 RINK HA Winnipeg U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 26 3 11 14 0.538 0.1234 0.1234
2022-23 RINK HA Winnipeg U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 25 2 3 5 0.200 0.0458 0.0456
2023-24 Balmoral Hall JWHL-U19 22 0 2 2 0.091 0.0341 0.0333
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4804
Defenseman overall
#576
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's · 2022-23
0.158 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2023-24
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2024-25
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.