IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rheya Zemlak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Pursuit of Excellence CSSHL-U18W 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Calgary Edge School U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 3 0 3 3 1.000 0.2291 0.2291 — —
2021-22 Calgary Edge School U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 27 3 2 5 0.185 0.0424 0.0424 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 UCHC SR 24 3 7 10 0.417
2024-25 Arcadia D3 UCHC — 11 1 1 2 0.182
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC — 23 2 6 8 0.348
2022-23 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC — 24 0 9 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · SUNY Oswego
+837.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7172
Defenseman overall
#671
Defenseman born in 2004
#560
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

Sylvie Wallin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Princeton (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brinna Dochniak
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ RIT (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bowlby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Serena Sommerfield
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Boston College
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amanda Smythe
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Talon Berlando
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Karin Knapp
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.