IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaitlin Roberts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-11-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 31 1 3 4 0.129 0.0195 0.0195 — —
2022-23 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 29 3 8 11 0.379 0.0573 0.0540 — —
2023-24 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 26 1 7 8 0.308 0.0465 0.0419 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 20 3 4 7 0.350
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 16 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5451
Defenseman overall
#509
Defenseman born in 2005
#4735
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sylvie Wallin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Princeton (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brinna Dochniak
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ RIT (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bowlby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Serena Sommerfield
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Boston College
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sylvie Wallin
Princeton ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Ellie Larson
RIT ·
0.143 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Brinna Dochniak
RIT ·
0.111 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.