← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlotte Siksik Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 OHA Mavericks Prep U18 CAHS-W 51 4 5 9 0.176 0.0633 0.0633
2020-21 RINK HA Winnipeg U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1145 0.1145
2021-22 RINK HA Winnipeg U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 22 4 4 8 0.364 0.0833 0.0833
2022-23 RINK HA Winnipeg U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 24 2 4 6 0.250 0.0573 0.0544
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 JR 22 4 2 6 0.273
2024-25 Arcadia D3 16 0 1 1 0.062
2023-24 Arcadia D3 23 3 1 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2023-24 · Arcadia
+179.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4207
Defenseman overall
#440
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Harvard (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Boston College
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Harvard ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Boston College ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.