← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isabella Brama Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 1 3 4 0.160 0.0242 0.0242
2020-21 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 19 1 5 6 0.316 0.0477 0.0477
2021-22 Academy of Holy Angels (W) USHS-MN-W 28 0 11 11 0.393 0.0593 0.0593
2022-23 Academy of Holy Angels (W) USHS-MN-W 27 3 7 10 0.370 0.0559 0.0559
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA JR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA 25 0 1 1 0.040
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4670
Defenseman overall
#3969
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Harvard (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.07 No data
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2014-15
0.074 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.